Bifurcation points

Bifurcation points. I think that we've all experienced this concept at one point or another. Harris (1999) describes Bifurcation points as threshold periods in the decision making process of groups. The idea is that groups cross levels, borders, or thresholds of agreement and understanding at certain points, which sometimes comes into conflict with individual members times of suggestion.(31) Essentially, this states that a group can only reach a collaborative understanding of something at a certain point, and be ready for input regarding the subject only at that time, regardless of individual understanding levels. The main example given is when, during a discussion, one member makes a proposal or gives and idea, and the rest of the group overlooks it or doesnt fully understand it at that point. Its not until later during the group communicative process that the idea is proposed again, sometimes by a different member, but being essentially the same, and the group excepts it. This can be a frustrating experience to endure for most people that see themselves as the initial "idea person". It can leave the person feeling overlooked and devalued as a member of the group. But, as Harris states, it has more to do with the timing of the proposal and the groups proximity to the "decision threshold". Simply put, sometimes a group is ready to decide, sometimes its not. This may be due in part to the groups understanding of the discussion, or their comfortably with the situation or idea. People like to be sure of things, especially in groups, and they most often don't like surprises or underdeveloped proposals. So, although one may have the answers a little earlier and be ready to share them, sometimes its best to wait a little till the group is ready to hear them. And, if you wait till after they've got a couple ideas in mind, you can spring your amazing, awesome proposal or suggestion on them in the end and be the coolest person ever.!!!